Updated: House passed tax package
March 8th, 2010 by Niki Reading | 1 Comment | Filed in UncategorizedThe House passed their tax package last night, 52 to 45. Read the bill here. And read some of the debate below.
Rep. Ross Hunter: “As you’re aware, we face a difficult supplemental budget. Our job is to produce a balanced budget. In fact, it’s a legal requirement,” he said. “It’s also important that we have a balanced budget that meets a moral definition of balanced,” he said. He said the package closes exemptions that have been in place for decades and no longer make economic sense. “The revenue from this part of the package funds core services.
Rep. Ed Orcutt: “I don’t think we have exhausted all opportunities and I don’t think that the gentleman from the 48th has listed all the options,” he said. He said the Legislature hasn’t taken reform seriously enough. “It’s unfortunate that we haven’t taken that road, because that’s a win-win road. Here, we’re pitting the taxpayer against the tax taker.”
Rep. Larry Haler said he is opposed to the candy tax because it will affect Washington-based businesses like Almond Roca and Liberty Orchards.
Rep. Jay Rodne: “There has been no attempt, Mr. Speaker, to really look at structural reform of our budget,” he said. He said failure to look at reform has led to legislators saying they must choose between “kids and healthcare and forgo our commitments to our communities and our future or raise taxes.” “We’re going to come back here next year and the situation will be of a much greater magnitude.”
Rep. Kevin Parker: “My fear is, this is not a credible plan to balance the budget,” he said. “This budget is a stew that is undigestible to the stomach of Washington.” He said Washington has high unemployment and low consumer confidence — and that means it’s not the time for a big tax increase.
Rep. Larry Springer: “I’ve been in business for 30 years … and in order to do that, I’ve had to have one primary objective,” he said: Cash flow. “And in fact, I have been able to maintain that cash flow by competing,” he said. “What I hope to see out of this package is the realization from my government that while I’m not afraid of competition … I would like that fight to be fair,” he said. Thsi tax proposal does that, he said, because it eliminates tax exemptions for out-of-state business.
Rep. Norm Johnson said he doesn’t think elective cosmetic surgeries should not be taxes. “Maybe this is something that maybe should come out of this bill because I think we need to be thinking about the human aspects of people who face surgery,” he said. He said many people who choose to have plastic surgery have a reason for doing so.
Rep. Eileen Cody: “I just have to correct some misinformation here,” she said. “We are talking about cosmetic surgery …not reconstructive surgery.”
Tags: tax




