Reynaldo S. Verduzco v King County Washington. Whether the trial court erred in giving certain jury instructions; denying King County’s for-cause and peremptory challenges; excluding King County’s expert witness; and denying King County’s motion for a new trial based on excessive emotional damages and cumulative error? On cross-appeal, did the trial court err when it reduced Verduzco’s attorneys’ lodestar rates and deducted 20 percent from the fee award overall based on Verduzco’s unsuccessful claims?
Division 2 Court of Appeals
